{"id":31906,"date":"2024-11-01T09:15:14","date_gmt":"2024-11-01T13:15:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.au.org\/?post_type=cs_article&#038;p=31906"},"modified":"2024-11-01T09:15:14","modified_gmt":"2024-11-01T13:15:14","slug":"supreme-court-preview-2024-25","status":"publish","type":"cs_article","link":"https:\/\/www.au.org\/the-latest\/church-and-state\/articles\/supreme-court-preview-2024-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Preview 2024-25"},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; When the U.S. Supreme Court returned to the bench on the first Monday in October, no explicit church-state separation cases were waiting on the justices\u2019 docket for the start of the 2024-25 term. But that doesn\u2019t mean religious freedom advocates are breathing easy \u2014 there are a handful of cases waiting in the wings [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"cs_issue_tax":[251],"cs_article_type":[160],"class_list":["post-31906","cs_article","type-cs_article","status-publish","hentry","cs_issue_tax-november-2024-church-state-magazine","cs_article_type-featured"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.au.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cs_article\/31906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.au.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cs_article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.au.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/cs_article"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.au.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cs_article\/31906\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.au.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"cs_issue_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.au.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cs_issue_tax?post=31906"},{"taxonomy":"cs_article_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.au.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cs_article_type?post=31906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}